Greater Democracy: Democracy for a connected world.

Please donate to help cover the costs of operating Greater Democracy. Note that Greater Democracy is not a formal organization, and your donation is not tax deductible. Greater Democracy is not affiliated with any other business, organization, or party.


February 3, 2005

A Frame for Framing

Recently, progressives have discovered ‘framing’, or how to talk about their beliefs in a way that other people will listen and respond. Granted, there are all kinds of bells and whistles about how to do this effectively, however, a friend recently wrote down these thoughts (with a little minor editing of my own) about what we really need to be doing.

Get in touch with your own values; know them well. Engage in respectful discussions with people with different viewpoints. Do not argue. Do not be vitriolic. Express your values and find common ground with the person you’ve been talking with. Shake hands over your newfound friend; go buy him or her a beer. Participate in the local culture. Watch a Sitcom, go to a little league game, attend a PTA meeting, and chat at a beauty salon. Embrace and smile, knowing we are all Americans after all.

It seems as if some people, especially progressives, need a complicated program to understand the Jungian aspects of language to get back to a core principle, to get out and talk with people, and do it politely. While this might not exactly be Framing in a Lakoffian context, it is the basis of communications.

Many Christians, out there seeking to spread their beliefs have understood the importance of this for years.

So, we need people to understand their values, and by this we mean more than just the value of a toothbrush at Walmart. We need people to understand to core principles of what they believe and talk in a friendly way with others about these principles.

This isn’t just good advice for progressives. The nation would be much better off if we all learned to act this way.

Posted by Aldon Hynes at February 3, 2005 7:46 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Excellent, Aldon. And down-to-earth true. I've been reading Lakoff and thinking a lot about frames, but maybe frames are too limited and we need to be about values. I've posted here a lot about values, and I agree that the first step in creating the kind of society we want is to know what our core values are and to act accordingly.

Some progressives might enjoy self-righteous venting, but it will get them moving in the exact opposite direction from where they want to go.

Posted by: Elissa at February 3, 2005 10:52 AM

It is so true. Getting out more from behind monitors and TVs for real facetime, coupled with the tactile sense of touch (a hand, an arm, a shoulder) builds kinship and influence in enormous ways.

Posted by: Kevin Hayden at February 5, 2005 8:20 PM

What is a progressive, other than a liberal? Is John Kerry a progressive? Not a chance, he is everything to everybody. And thats why he lost. Howard Dean would have done better than old John boy.
It is a shame to see the left losing all control includine self control. It is a sad day when Dr Rice is voted against by 15 people including Senator Byrd. Who used to party with his sheets on with David Duke.
As one of the biggest sinners to ever walk this earth. I will tell you I didnt vote for Bush because of his values. I voted for hime because I know where he stands.
I believe in rights for all, but most progressives dont think I should have the right to smoke anywhere. I have heard of bans in my house if I have kids, bans in apartment building since my smoke filled air will destroy the the apartment. I cant drink and smoke in many states, yet even if I smoke a carton at the bar, I will not kill anybody from smoking to much and driving home. But gay men have helped spread aids across the globe and forced me to use condoms when having group sex. But still I believe in gay rights. More people will die of aids than smoking this year. And the number is growing.
So if you consider yourself progressive be progressive. We all deserve rights, but my vices are never fought for. Obama wouldnt have won if Jack Ryan was not outed by the media for going to swing clubs. I have to pay 12000 a year for 3 trips to hedo, because at least I wont end up in jail during a raid of consenting adults.
I am the same bile to the left and to the right. So I may as well vote for tax breaks, and equality. Since the right will consider my lifestyle wrong and also the gay lifestyle. Why should gays have more rights than me? I could lose my own children for my lifestyle. And I will never be able to adopt.
Its just something to think about if you want to be progressives. Be progressive for all, this PC bullshit is just that BS.

Posted by: Rob Razor at February 6, 2005 5:22 PM

Unfortunately, I have run into great resistence from people to learning about framing (and as Elissa said above, learning about framing involves learning about our own values and I would add, the connections and associations in our own hearts and minds). Apparently, ranting about the right is in vogue in some circles right now. I do hope that changes soon. ;-)

Framing and reframing really isn't hard to do. For anyone willing to spend ten minutes trying their hand at an easy exercise, I recommend looking into Gabriele's Rico's book (and site) "Writing The Natural Way" http://www.gabrielerico.com/Main/AboutGabrieleRico.htm

specifically:
http://www.gabrielerico.com/Main/ClusteringSampleVignettes.htm

namaste. this is my first post here. :-)

Posted by: kj in missouri at February 22, 2005 2:50 PM

Also, these links from the Rockridge Institute might prove useful: http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/research/wallack/levels

specifically: Conceptual Levels: Bringing It Home to Values by Jason Patent, George Lakoff
http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/projects/strategic/conceptlevels

Posted by: kj in missouri at February 22, 2005 4:01 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?