The Peacham Volcano, a natural draft iCan TLUD stove
An open source stove project in progress.

Here we see the Peacham Volcano , closely modeled on the Swiss Volcano stove, as it is used. The cup, from a Swiss Volcano stove unit, with the water to be boiled sits inside the iCan made from a single pineapple juice can. The iCan, in turn, sits on two angle irons inside a three pound Costco coffee can. This outer can has four functions: 1] wind shield; 2] insulation and heat retention; 3] modulates the air flow into the system as the size and number of holes varies; 4] safety — as the bottom is intact, it catches any stray hot coals.
With an ambient temperature of about 6.5 degrees C and water of about the same temperature, on a windy and blustery New England Fall day, the Peacham Vulcano was able to boil 400 ml of water in just under 10 minutes. On a fuel load of about 3/4 cup of wood pellets, this translates to about 150 ml of fuel per liter boiled. This was done with a minimum of smoke and soot.
Wolrdstove reports that their small, patented, Lucia stove, not a TLUD, only requires about 80 ml of wood pellet fuel to boil one liter of water at 10 degrees C ambient temperature with 10 degree C water. This raises the interesting question of what is the limit on the efficiency of natural draft TLUDs with no moving parts?
On the other hand, the open source Peacham Volcano stove, excepting the cup with tapered sides, costs $0.00. This may make the Peacham Volcano a natural companion to the Lucia stove when it comes to both education and entry level use. In both these cases, cost is a significant factor in the rate of diffusion and adoption of cooking with the heat of pyrolysis.

This shows the core of the Peacham Volcano stove. Note that the “pot” sits in the exhaust stream and is thus heated around all sides and the bottom. This configuration also exposed the least amount of the pot to the chilling effects of cold winds. This reminds me of old wood cook stoves that had removable rings at some burners to allow pots to sit directly in the hot flue gases. What is old is new again. This suggests that not only does the heat engine have to optimized, but that it may be very beneficial to consider the pot as a part of the system that must also be optimized. Clearly the goal is to create a result greater than the sum of its parts.

The Peacham Volcano stove with the pot from a Swiss Volcano stove. Here you can see that the pot has tapered sides such that it does not block the exit path of the hot exhaust gases.
Note: The Swiss Volvano stove is based on full combustion of the fuel. It’s desired final product is only mineral ash. The Peacham Volcano is based on pyrolysis of the fuel. It’s desired final product is elemental carbon biochar. When evaluating stoves, it is important to also take into consideration the utility and value of the final product: ash vs biochar.
The Open Source Stove Project page is here.
This work is covered by a CreativeCommons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
9 comments Jock Gill | Agriculture, Climate Change, Community, Empowerment, Energy, Technology
Hello Jock,
As a rule WS [WorldStove] does not do boiling tests. We tune the stoves to local cooking traditions. Not all countries use lids. In Haiti and Niger we used lids, in Sierra Leone and Ghana we did not, in Ethiopia we did not use pots.
Rather than try to bid and test to a standard we adapt the stoves to have the lowest emissions possible while permitting people to continue their traditions. While the big groups and funders would like to have a way to compare stoves, our focus is not the big groups but the individuals perhaps that is why our stove seems to be doing so well. After all, a stove that is really good at boiling 5 liters of water in a flat bottomed stainless steel pot with out a lid, using fuel that is not available in the field, provides little or no indication of how effective it will be in the field. We’re happy to let the big groups talk and bring attention to stoves, in the mean time last week we made 8000 more stoves.
I find it helpful to focus on one country and make the best possible stove for them and then move on to another and another and so on. This way we get away from theory and experimentation and really start helping the people who need a better cleaner, more economical way to do their daily cooking.
Hope this helps, and keep up the good work
N
[Nathaniel Mulcahy - posted with permission]
The scale of the problem:
If we want to have 1 Billion clean burning stoves in place in the next 500 weeks, 10 years, then we have to install 2 million units per week! Every week for 500 weeks.
This will only be possible if we use a decentralized and distributed solution that leverages the human capital at the edges. That is, we have to mirror the internet model and its success.
What if cans came with the hole pattern, and sizes, printed on them — beneath the paper label? Just peel off the paper wrapper, punch out the holes with two or three nails of different sizes and, presto, you now have a stove. No written directions, no fancy tools, no measuring, just punch and cook. A little help with how to load and light the stove would need to be provided. So stove tutors could go from place to place cooking all along the way.
Might have to pay for new printing technology that would allow cans to be printed on both tops, bottoms, and sides. But this cost would be diluted over millions of cans and many years.
This could be tested by region and with the suppliers who were sending the greatest number of cans into the area of being tested for rates of adoption, diffusion and overall benefits delivered.
With regard to “What if cans came with the hole pattern, and sizes, printed on them…”
You say “No written directions…” and then you say, “…stove tutors could go from place to place…”
This seems inefficient. Why not put the “directions” on the inside of a “tin can’ label?
As Wikipedia says, “A can usually has a printed paper or plastic label glued to the outside of the curved surface, indicating its contents. Some labels contain additional information, such as recipes, on the reverse side. A label can also be printed directly onto the metal.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tin_can
These directions don’t even need to be words, but could simply be images (pictures/drawings) like Ikea?
http://jeanbarker.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/ikea-instructions1.png?w=400&h=390
Lloyd,
I am all for things that will make adoption easier. I also do not want to assume literacy as a precondition for success.
My thinking now is that the best iCan ambassadors/trainers will be local youth who learn all about it school.
Thanks for suggesting Erich. I will follow up with him.
Thanks for posting, Jock
Hello Jock,
Great work you are doing. I very much enjoyed the iCan for Educators PDF. Very well written and clearly explained with photos.
I was very interested to read Nathaniel Mulcahy response to you. I am fascinated with his design of coaxial pyrolysis/gasification – His design is able to pyrolize from the outside in in a cylindrical flame front towards the center…
Would like to follow your open source project – please add me to your distribution list if you are maintaining one.
Regards,
Steve…
Steve,
Thanks for posting a comment. I am glad you found the intro to iCans readable. You might also want to look at the photos and comments I have posted on Flickr:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jockgill/sets/72157626640937954/
As I learn more, I discover that the iCan design also tends to work from the outside in — esp. if you control the primary air carefully and source it more from the edges than the center. Further, my latest work with an insulated iCan suggests that the more heat you retain in a TLUD, the more it behaves like a retort. A well insulated TLUD will need very little primary air — much less than I thought before I started cutting it back.
Regards,
Jock
As for lists, I currently am not keeping one. You are actually the first to make the suggestion
Great work, Jock!
I really enjoyed the photos and your video interview.
I will soon try to make an Ican to make some agave biochar
All the best,
Arturo
Arturo,
Thanks for the positive feed back. Do you think you could develop a champion in Mexico who could take this to local schools and develop interest in teaching this? The more students who know more about pyrolysis and its benefits, the faster the adoption of pyrolysis will scale up. Let thousands of students make agave biochar as part of their education. That would be a good thing, yes? What do you think?
Jock