<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Cultural DNA</title>
	<link>http://www.greaterdemocracy.org/archives/629</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jock Gill</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterdemocracy.org/archives/629#comment-3449</link>
		<dc:creator>Jock Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greaterdemocracy.org/archives/629#comment-3449</guid>
		<description>I am cross posting this from Dewayne Hendrick's list.  Is this an example of how the media acts as a guardian of the current cultural DNA?

[Note:  This item comes from reader Robert Berger.  DLH]

From: "Robert J. Berger" 
Date: December 10, 2007 11:08:03 AM PST
To: Dewayne Hendricks , David Farber 
Subject: The Genius of the "Structural Constraint"

Another way of saying Code / Technical Infrastructure is "Law" [DNA - JPG]



Some Concise Chomsky on how the structure of media reinforces the dominant views and blocks innovative or unconvential views.

I think this is the fundamental reason why entities that control the "pipes" can not be allowed to control the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am cross posting this from Dewayne Hendrick&#8217;s list.  Is this an example of how the media acts as a guardian of the current cultural DNA?</p>
<p>[Note:  This item comes from reader Robert Berger.  DLH]</p>
<p>From: &#8220;Robert J. Berger&#8221;<br />
Date: December 10, 2007 11:08:03 AM PST<br />
To: Dewayne Hendricks , David Farber<br />
Subject: The Genius of the &#8220;Structural Constraint&#8221;</p>
<p>Another way of saying Code / Technical Infrastructure is &#8220;Law&#8221; [DNA - JPG]</p>
<p>Some Concise Chomsky on how the structure of media reinforces the dominant views and blocks innovative or unconvential views.</p>
<p>I think this is the fundamental reason why entities that control the &#8220;pipes&#8221; can not be allowed to control the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jock Gill</title>
		<link>http://www.greaterdemocracy.org/archives/629#comment-3445</link>
		<dc:creator>Jock Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.greaterdemocracy.org/archives/629#comment-3445</guid>
		<description>Please read Al Gore's December 10th speech for an example of the leadership that is possible.

http://blog.algore.com/2007/12/nobel_prize_acceptance_speech.html

Now if only the active candidates could step up to this level of leadership.  Their unwillingness to do so far is not to their greater credit.    It strikes me that unless they are willing to do so, they risk being relegated to the 2nd or 3rd string teams.  Can we afford to elect a president who is not clearly a leader from the first string?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read Al Gore&#8217;s December 10th speech for an example of the leadership that is possible.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.algore.com/2007/12/nobel_prize_acceptance_speech.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.algore.com/2007/12/nobel_prize_acceptance_speech.html</a></p>
<p>Now if only the active candidates could step up to this level of leadership.  Their unwillingness to do so far is not to their greater credit.    It strikes me that unless they are willing to do so, they risk being relegated to the 2nd or 3rd string teams.  Can we afford to elect a president who is not clearly a leader from the first string?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
