Where we are, Where we need to be

2 Responses to “Where we are, Where we need to be”

David Yarrow says:

September 8, 2009 at 10:45 am

a few quick comments:

recent measurements at hawaii put CO2 at 390ppm

how about instead of “non-linear & complex” make that “circular & cyclical”?

or “circular & multi-dimensional”?

also, add “monoculture” vs. “biodiversity”?

and “monopoly hierarchy” vs. “community democracy”?

“physical, chemical” vs. “biology, ecology”?

your general plan to map the dichotomy between industrial vs. sustainable is useful to help folks grasp the nature of the emerging paradigm shift. however, this approach is rather abstract compared to the practical, physical mode most folks operate and live in.

i am especially impressed by the realization that every technology and food culture comes with implicit social organization.

dancing turtle

Lopa Brunjes says:

September 9, 2009 at 6:57 pm

Excellent short visual take-away. Love it.